After the peer review team completes its evaluation, the accrediting agency reviews the findings and issues an official decision. This decision reflects the institution’s overall performance, its adherence to accreditation standards, and its ability to provide a high‑quality educational experience.

The agency may grant full accreditation, which confirms that the institution meets all required standards. In some cases, the agency may issue accreditation with conditions, requiring the institution to address specific concerns within a set timeframe. If significant issues are identified, the institution may be placed on probation, signaling that improvements are necessary to maintain accredited status. In rare cases, accreditation may be denied or withdrawn.

Along with the decision, the accrediting agency provides a detailed report outlining strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations for improvement. This report serves as both an accountability tool and a guide for institutional development. Even institutions that receive full accreditation use these recommendations to strengthen programs, enhance student support, and refine long‑term planning.